Talking Fantasy

Hello everyone, i just came up with a most fascinating concept of the being of 'time', and i'd like everyone's opinion about it(also starting a discussion) Because it is, in some sort of way, a part of life,and therefore a spiritual thing, i suppose i'll have to put it in here(if not in place, it can be moved)
anyway, the statement i came up with is:

'Time is the precise sequence and ordering of atoms(or molecules),captured in their current state of being(to what other molecules they are connected,being solid,liquid,or gas, their temperature,their involvance in processes(combustion,photosynteses,changing form,etc.). A moment in time has passed, once something in that sequence has changed. From there on, a new moment has started,ending when that moment has also changed. And so there is a continious forming of a new moment(or sequence),whenever something has changed.
the sequence of every sequence; the line of all the sequences,is what can be referred to as the past, and so the current(but also changing as soon as you think it over(the proces of thinking things over)) state is the present, and of course; yet-to-be constructions&combinations of all those atoms; sequences are to be the future.'

There is no such thing as time if you can't take the past (Urd) and turn it (Verdandi) into a future (Skuld).

Yes, spiritual traveling. Duh. Timetravelling goes against the laws of nature :/

Seen the movie 'Lola rent'?
A girl, Lola, is running and gets hit by a car. Same sequence happens every time again and again, except for the fact that one minor change occurs in her actions during the running. And it influences the outcome every time.

The concept I mentioned is Nordic in nature. In that concept, there is real no past and no future, only “that what was”, “that what is”, and “that what will be.” The block of clay will stay a block of clay, unless you make a pot or a statue out of it. While making the pot you still see what was (the clay) and a bit of what will be (the shape of the pot). That what will be will bear the traces of that what was (you still can see it is made of clay, the “past”) and that what is (the fingerprints of how the clay was shaped into a pot, the “present”).

In the present we can see that what was because it is part of the present and many possible shapes of what will be, which lurk in the present where we shape the future. The three are interconnected and somehow the same. The concept is personalised by the three Norns Urd, Verdandi and Skuld. They cannot be seen apart from each other.

Thus time is made by changes.

Those who are able to see the raw block of clay when look at the pot can see in the past. Those who are able to see the shapes the raw clay can have when using tools (the present) are able to see in the future. The past is part of our present, and the future is there in rough shapes. This makes walking in other times fairly easy.

Some other thoughts:
Can you measure time if nothing changes? Not even the smallest parts in the universe?
Is there still time at 0 Kelvin, when everything is frozen?

If it were possible there is -10 Kelvin, aren´t things moving backwards in time at that temperature? How can you tell?

If time is made by changes, even the smallest changes, how are we able to tell these changes put us forwards in time, and not backwards? If you stand still and the only thing changing is a car that drives by, you might experience time by the change of the place of the car, even though you don´t change at all. For the person in the car, everything in the car is “frozen” and doesn´t change. But you on the outside, even though you stand still, move when seen from the car. The car can drive forwards, backwards, thus you –standing still- move backwards, cq. forwards. Back in time? To whom?
How can you tell if a change returns the present situation to a former situation (the past) or to a future situation? Aren´t we also shaping the past?

Time is no dimension in modern science (quantumphysics), btw.

And Lola doesn´t go back in time, be relives the moment making different choices. She does not know what happened the other time. The movie is not about timetravelling, but about shaping the future with the choices we have now.